The U.S.-Iran war began February 28, 2026, with U.S. and Israeli airstrikes killing Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and striking nuclear sites, prompting Iranian missile retaliation and the Strait of Hormuz closure.
A popular post by UAE commentator Saif al-Dareei accuses Obama of sending billions to Iran that funded its missiles and proxies, drawing over 21,000 likes and echoes from a clip of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Defenders note the cash settled a pre-1979 arms deal and highlight the JCPOA’s nuclear rollback until Trump’s 2018 withdrawal, while others blame figures from Jimmy Carter to Trump amid rising casualties over 2,000.
The claim that President Obama “bankrolled” $150 billion to Iran in exchange for the nuclear deal is a common point of political contention, but it is technically inaccurate based on the details of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Here is a breakdown of the facts:
- Frozen Assets, Not U.S. Taxpayer Money: The funds in question were not direct payments from U.S. taxpayers. They were Iranian foreign assets (primarily from oil sales) that had been frozen in foreign banks due to international sanctions.
- Amount Disputed: While estimates of total frozen Iranian assets varied, U.S. officials at the time estimated the amount Iran could actually access after debts was closer to $50 billion, not $150 billion, as a large portion was tied up in debts.
- Release Mechanism: As part of the JCPOA, these nuclear-related sanctions were lifted, allowing Iran to access their own money once they complied with nuclear restrictions.
- $1.7 Billion Settlement: Separate from the unfreezing of assets, the Obama administration did pay $1.7 billion in cash to Iran in 2016. This was a settlement regarding a failed 1979 arms deal. It consisted of $400 million of Iran’s original trust fund and $1.3 billion in interest.
- Context on the Deal: The 2015 JCPOA was designed to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for lifting economic sanctions, with verification conducted by the IAEA. The Obama administration argued that releasing these funds was a legal obligation upon sanctions relief, while critics argued the money would be used to fund regional terrorism.
Relations between the U.S. and Iran worsened this week as Iran’s foreign minister said the United States would suffer “heavy losses” if the Israel-Hamas conflict expanded.
As tensions simmer, conservative commentators shared claims that President Barack Obama’s administration had given $150 billion to Iran, effectively, they argued, funding Hamas.
Former U.S. President Barack Obama in 2016, delivering a statement on the relations between US and Iran, including the release of the US hostages that…
The Claim
A post on X by Jack Posobiec, posted on October 16, 2023, referenced a Charlie Kirk tweet from September 11, 2015, which stated “Iran funds Hamas. Hamas kills Americans and Jews. Now we give Iran $150 billion. Where do you think that money will go? #IranDeal”
Posobiec wrote “Charlie warned us and now people are mad at him.”
The Facts
Kirk, founder of conservative student group Turning Point USA, was likely referring to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which granted Iran access to frozen assets.
This was not funding given to Iran. The amount quoted refers to foreign assets that belonged to Iran and were frozen by sanctions imposed to impede its nuclear program. The JCPOA was also an international agreement between Iran and a number of major world powers, including the U.S.
How much these assets were worth has not been released, but $150 billion is the highest estimate provided by U.S. officials.
The figure was mentioned in passing by Obama in an interview with The Atlantic in 2015, when questioned where the money could end up.
“The question is, if Iran has $150 billion parked outside the country, does the IRGC automatically get $150 billion?” Obama said.
“Does that $150 billion then translate by orders of magnitude into their capacity to project power throughout the region?”
The figure was not quoted by The Atlantic and Obama did not state where the estimate came from.
However, far lower estimates including by senior U.S. and Iranian officials were also shared.
In 2015, the former governor of Iran’s central bank, Valiollah Seif, said in a state television address that the value of the frozen assets had been exaggerated.
Seif was sentenced in 2021 to 10 years in prison on corruption charges, reported Reuters.
The former official said that there were $29 billion of unlockable assets: $23 billion in foreign exchange that belonged to the bank and $6 billion of the Tehran government’s money, The Times of Israel and Arabic news channel Al Arabiya reported in July 2015. The $29 billion Seif quoted was also reported by The New York Times.
Voice of America reported in January 2016, after the deal was signed, quotes from Seif saying Iran had gained access to $32 billion in assets.
Then U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew told Congress in July 2015 that Iran gained access to $56 billion via the agreement, a fact check by PolitiFact in 2018 noted.
In an August 2015 written testimony, Adam J. Szubin, then-acting Under Secretary of Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, said that while estimates suggested the Central Bank of Iran had foreign exchange assets between $100 billion to $125 billion, the usable “liquid assets” after sanctions were lifted would be around $50 billion.
“The other $50-70 billion of total CBI foreign exchange assets are either obligated in illiquid projects (such as over 50 projects with China) that cannot be monetized quickly, if at all, or are composed of outstanding loans to Iranian entities that cannot repay them,” Szubin said.
“These assets would not become accessible following sanctions relief.”
In any case, the amount was not American taxpayer money, as perhaps implied by the phrase, “Now we give Iran $150 billion,” though it is not entirely clear what “give” may mean in this context.
Whatever the truth of the figure, the deal, which committed Iran to cut back on its nuclear enrichment and development programs, did not only involve the United States. China, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the wider European Union bloc all also agreed to lift sanctions on Iran.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in May 2018. Following the death of General Qassem Soleimani, an Iranian military commander, in a U.S. drone strike in January 2020 that was authorized by Trump, Iran said that it would no longer abide by the terms of the agreement.
After Hamas attacks in Israel on October 7, a number of Republicans also shared via social media posts that the Biden administration had recently paid $6 billion to Iran.
The U.S. had agreed to unfreeze $6 billion in Iranian oil funds held in a South Korean bank, as well as return five Iranian prisoners who have faced charges in the U.S. in exchange for five Americans.
The United States has not publicly linked Iran to the attacks in Israel, following a report by The Wall Street Journal that suggested Tehran had played a role.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken told CNN on October 8: “We have not yet seen evidence that Iran directed or was behind this particular attack, but there is certainly a long relationship.”
Democratic Senator Cory Booker told CBS on Friday that the funds had been “frozen.”
“A dollar of it has not gone out,” said Booker, who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. Senators, he said, had received “assurances” the money has been frozen.
The U.S. did not “give” $150 billion to Iran in 2015. In 2015, as part of an international deal with Iran called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Iran agreed to cut back on nuclear enrichment programs in exchange for the unfreezing of its own assets.
The U.S. taxpayer paid nothing toward this, as might be implied by the post, and the value of the assets was said by some, including the U.S. Treasury, to be less than $150 billion.
© 2026, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
