Australia, France, the UK, Japan and the USA have reportedly expressed strong interest in partnering with India to study debris and the unexploded Chinese-built PL-15E long-range air-to-air missile recovered at multiple locations inside Indian territory.
The PL-15, currently China’s beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missile, is a further development of the PL-12 missile with extended range and AESA seeker. It is known to be deployed on frontline fighters of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF), including the Chengdu J-10C and the jointly developed JF-17 Thunder Block III.
Both fighter platforms were active participants in the recent high-intensity air conflict between Pakistan and India, marking one of the first operational uses of the PL-15 in a near-peer engagement scenario.
According to official PAF claims, its J-10C multirole fighters employed the PL-15, downing one Indian Air Force (IAF) Jaguar combat aircraft during the escalation.
Indian Air Force also lost three Dassault Rafales, one Su-30MKI, two MiG-29, and one Mirage 2000 to Pakistani AMRAAM missiles. Indian Air Force crashed two Rafale after returning from night raid.
The missile’s apparent operational success has catapulted the PL-15 into the global spotlight, with defence analysts, militaries, and think tanks alike racing to assess the system’s real-world performance and implications for regional air dominance.
Despite its claimed effectiveness, not all PL-15 missiles found their mark, with several reportedly failing to detonate or going off-course and missing their target, allowing Indian forces to recover remnants in surprisingly intact condition.
According to Indian media, some of the debris, including key electronic components, was discovered in the village of Kamahi Devi in Punjab’s Hoshiarpur district, and additional sites are under investigation.
These missile fragments have since become a prime target for foreign intelligence exploitation, with multiple Western intelligence agencies seeking access to the debris for forensic analysis and technical reverse engineering.
Sources within India’s defence media confirm that several members of the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance—comprising the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand—have “expressed interest” in examining the recovered PL-15 components closely.
Outside the Five Eyes network, strategic powers such as France and Japan reportedly engage in behind-the-scenes discussions with New Delhi to secure collaborative access to the missile debris for independent assessment.
Japan has requested Indian authorities to allow the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries engineering team to investigate the debris and unexploded missiles.
The PL-15 Missile
The PL-15 is a fast-evolving missile ecosystem, particularly as it begins to catch up with the American AIM-120 AMRAAM and the European MBDA Meteor in performance.
The missile itself represents a significant leap in Chinese aerospace capabilities. It can reach speeds of Mach 4 and engage airborne targets at distances of up to 200 kilometres—well beyond traditional BVR envelopes. The PL-15E, the export derivative, however, has a range of 145km.
The missile’s stems from its AESA (Active Electronically Scanned Array) radar seeker, which enables autonomous target tracking even in heavily contested electromagnetic environments.
Coupled with a robust two-way datalink, the PL-15 can receive mid-course updates from the launch aircraft.
Its propulsion is powered by a dual-pulse solid-fuel rocket motor, granting it sustained high-speed performance throughout its trajectory.
Physically, the PL-15 measures approximately four meters in length and weighs around 200 kilograms. It is optimized for carriage by a range of Chinese-origin platforms and potentially by export customers aligned with Beijing’s strategic orbit.
Discovery of PL-15 debris in India
The discovery of PL-15 missile debris inside India carries profound strategic implications and offers valuable intelligence-gathering opportunities for foreign intelligence agencies, particularly from Western countries.
The analysis of this debris serves multiple critical purposes, both tactical and strategic.
Western intelligence agencies—such as the U.S. DIA, NSA, CIA, and allied defence contractors—would prioritise forensic exploitation of the PL-15’s electronics, propulsion system, guidance components, and datalink modules.
Recovering debris from sensors, RF seekers, or the two-way datalink antenna could reveal the signal processing architecture, encryption standards, or radar seeker bandwidths.
This allows NATO and allied air forces to fine-tune ECM (Electronic Countermeasure) protocols to jam or spoof the PL-15’s seeker or disrupt its guidance in real-world air combat.
By examining the missile’s radar seeker, intelligence services can deduce the PL-15’s exact radar frequencies and tracking behaviour.
This informs threat libraries used in Western fighter jets (like the F-35, Eurofighter, and Rafale), enabling their onboard RWRs (Radar Warning Receivers) and EW systems to better recognize and counter PL-15 threats.
It also enhances simulation accuracy in training and test environments like Nellis AFB’s Red Flag exercises.
If the PL-15 debris originated from a Pakistani JF-17 or J-10C, the incident confirms China’s export of a long-range active radar-guided missile previously believed to be exclusive to the PLAAF.
This would reshape assessments by Western defence ministries and Five Eyes intelligence partners regarding the proliferation of next-generation Chinese weapons in South Asia and beyond. It could accelerate arms control dialogues or pressure diplomatic engagements to limit future missile transfers to volatile regions.
Real Combat Capabilities vs Propaganda
Debris analysis helps validate or refute China’s often exaggerated missile performance claims, such as the PL-15’s alleged range of 200 km, rocket engine, or advanced capability.
This is crucial because China rarely conducts transparent public testing of its missiles, so actual field remnants are rare windows into their true capability envelope. Findings may influence how Western air forces tactically plan BVR (Beyond Visual Range) engagements with potential PLAAF or PAF aircraft in a conflict scenario.
Given China’s reliance on Russian R-77 radar seekers, propulsion technologies, or even joint ventures in avionics, intelligence agencies would scrutinize the debris for components sourced from Russia.
China has used Russian-made propulsion, an R-77 semi-active seeker and a Vympel R-73 IR seeker for its domestic air-to-air missile.
This is particularly important amid Western sanctions against Moscow, as proof of Chinese-Russian defence collaboration can evade sanctions or military-industrial tracking.
It may also raise alarms about a triangular axis involving Russia, China, and Iran in missile development and export. China, Russia and Iran have a long history of importing dual-use technology from Europe and America to build missiles and fighter jets.
Understanding the PL-15’s composition and technology can help Western defence firms like Raytheon, MBDA, Lockheed Martin, or BAE Systems design superior-performing counter-missile systems, decoys, or new BVR missiles.
It would be also helpful for nations looking to upgrade their air defence networks, which may want to enhance the capabilities of their AWACS, EW and fighter jets.
Beyond tactical exploitation, the incident allows the West to recalibrate its military doctrines, electronic warfare systems, and geostrategic posture in the Indo-Pacific and South Asia, where the spectre of Chinese weapons in third-party hands grows ever more real.
Developed by the China Airborne Missile Academy (CAMA), the PL-15 is engineered to counter air assets such as airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) platforms and force-multiplier aircraft operating within layered air defence networks.
Its extended reach grants operators a stand-off capability that can disrupt adversary air formations before they can coordinate or respond effectively, reshaping the tactical calculus for regional air forces.
The message for Western air forces is clear: China’s missile technology is no longer theoretical, and the PL-15 may well represent the first generation of BVR threats that demand urgent doctrinal and technical countermeasures.
© 2025, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
