The Chinese VT-4 is touted as an advanced main battle tank, but the Nigerian Army questions its performance. Pakistan and Nigeria reported significant mechanical failures by both export customers.
The Nigerian Army purchased 35 VT-4 tanks under a reported $152 million agreement with Norinco and received the initial tanks in April 2020. These tanks were intended to fight back against the terrorist group Boko Haram, but instead, Boko haram is blowing up these Chinese tanks like a tin can.
A local armed group, possibly associated with Boko Haram, marked a considerable setback for the army’s counterinsurgency operations, where armoured vehicles are crucial.
Further undermining confidence in the platform, Nigerian defence sources have reported critical failures. During a military demonstration observed by high-ranking army officials, a VT-4 reportedly failed to fire its main cannon.
Nigerian media outlets confirm the VT-4 fleet suffers from persistent breakdowns and difficulties obtaining necessary spare parts, leaving numerous tanks non-operational. A similar incident occurred publicly in November 2024 when a VT-4 reportedly broke down during a dynamic display at the Zhuhai Air Show in China.
These recurring issues raise concerns about the tank’s build quality and Norinco’s commitment to providing adequate after-sales support to its international clients.
Pakistan, another major customer for the VT-4, is experiencing similar difficulties. The Pakistan Army planned to acquire many VT-4s (reportedly aiming for 468 units initially, though some sources reported different figures for licensed production deals) to modernise its armoured corps alongside its domestically produced Al-Khalid tanks.
However, the army significantly reduced its order to 258 units in 2025, signalling potential dissatisfaction with the VT-4’s capabilities and echoing previous issues encountered with armoured vehicles of Chinese origin.
The Al-Khalid tank program itself provides relevant context. Developed jointly by Pakistan’s Heavy Industries Taxila (HIT) and Norinco, based on the Chinese VT-1A (also known as MBT-2000), the Al-Khalid project has faced its hurdles.
Production reportedly stalled at approximately 250 units due to ongoing design problems and technical difficulties, particularly concerning its powertrain and fire control systems sourced from Ukraine.
The VT-4, marketed as a superior “3.5-generation” tank featuring upgrades like a more powerful
engine (1,200 hp), modern electronics, and enhanced armour compared to the VT-1A, was anticipated to rectify these deficiencies. However, despite a local assembly planned at HIT, its performance has reportedly failed to meet expectations.
Criticism has surfaced within Pakistan regarding the procurement process. Some observers allege that poor management and potentially corrupt dealings among military figures may have led to the acquisition of inadequate equipment, placing a financial burden on the country without delivering the required operational capability.
The VT-4’s perceived underperformance fuels claims that cost considerations and strategic ties with China might have been prioritised over battlefield effectiveness.
The difficulties encountered by both Nigeria and Pakistan with the VT-4 appear to fit a pattern sometimes associated with Chinese military exports: impressive technical specifications that are not consistently matched by real-world reliability or dependable long-term support.
In Nigeria, the tank’s functional failures in combat and training scenarios indicate potential weaknesses in its fundamental design or maintenance infrastructure. In Pakistan, the reduced order size and similarities to the Al-Khalid’s challenges suggest the VT-4 has not fulfilled its promise as a state-of-the-art MBT.
Norinco presented the VT-4 to showcase Chinese advances in armoured vehicle technology. Its features include a 125mm smoothbore main gun equipped with an autoloader, modular composite armour augmented with explosive reactive armour (ERA), and advanced digital command and communication systems.
However, the operational reports suggest these technological enhancements may not translate into consistent battlefield performance. For Nigeria, the shortage of spares and frequent mechanical issues severely hamper the tank’s utility against insurgents. For Pakistan, these problems add pressure to an already challenging armoured defence posture, particularly considering neighbouring India’s deployment of Soviet-era T-90S tanks and its derivative Arjun MBT program.
These repeated incidents place Norinco’s reputation as a primary international arms dealer under
scrutiny. The VT-4 has been exported to Thailand, Nigeria, and Pakistan, representing a significant part of China’s defence export strategy. However, Consistent reports of underperformance could dissuade potential future customers seeking reliable and cost-effective military hardware.
The consequences for Nigeria and Pakistan are immediate. They potentially involve compromised military readiness and significant financial investment yielding limited returns, particularly critical given the security challenges both nations currently face.
Nigeria may need to reconsider its procurement strategies and explore other options, although
financial limitations could restrict its choices. Pakistan’s reduced VT-4 order and the ongoing issues with the Al-Khalid might necessitate exploring alternative suppliers. However, the strong strategic relationship between Pakistan and China could cause such a complex shift soon.
All equipment breaks sometimes. Mechanical failures are common, and even the best maintenance regimes cannot prevent all of them. But some machines break down in more embarrassing ways than others. For example, the Chinese main battle tank VT-4 broke down during the Zhuhai Air Show, where it was trying to show its powers and capabilities to the international public.
The VT-4 is a Chinese main battle tank built by Norinco specifically for overseas export. China’s forces do not operate this specific model. The VT-4 entered service in 2017 to try to grow China’s presence in the international defence tech market. Currently, it is in service with Nigerian, Pakistani, and Thai forces, but China would like to export it more.
© 2025, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
