Pakistan has escalated its claims over the May confrontation, with retired Lt Gen Khalid Kidwai disclosing the tail numbers of four Indian Air Force Rafales allegedly shot down by the Pakistan Air Force.
Pakistan has dramatically escalated its claims regarding the May air confrontation with India, with retired Lieutenant General Khalid Kidwai declaring that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) not only shot down three but four Dassault Rafale fighter jets, releasing the tail numbers of the downed aircraft.
Speaking at a press conference organised by the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI), Lt Gen (R) Kidwai, a senior adviser to the country’s National Command Authority (NCA), disclosed the tail numbers of the destroyed Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafales as BS001, BS021, BS022, and BS027.
The National Command Authority (NCA) is a federal agency responsible for safeguarding Pakistan’s national security through command, control, and operational decision-making regarding the country’s nuclear weapons programme.
The announcement represents the most explicit allegation yet from Pakistan, moving beyond rhetoric into what Islamabad insists is verifiable detail, with the naming of specific Rafale airframes that India has never publicly admitted losing.
“The official number of Indian aircraft shot down is not six but seven aircraft,” Lt Gen Kidwai told reporters, adding that “four Rafales, one MiG-29, one Su-30, and one Mirage 2000” were destroyed in the air battles, while “India also lost one Israeli-made Heron UAV.”
This was the first time Pakistan publicly linked tail numbers to its long-standing claim of Rafale losses, a move seen as an attempt to cement international credibility in a contest of narratives where India has consistently denied suffering such catastrophic setbacks.
Lt Gen Kidwai, who once headed Pakistan’s powerful Strategic Plans Division (SPD), also used the platform to underline the strategic significance of the newly established Army Rocket Force Command (ARFC).
He asserted that the ARFC would “raise the nuclear threshold” by inserting an additional layer of deterrence between conventional operations and nuclear escalation, while stressing that the country’s nuclear posture remains the “ultimate shield against India.”
India’s Rafale fleet, acquired from Dassault Aviation in a USD 8.7 billion (RM40.7 billion) deal, was intended to serve as the cutting edge of the Indian Air Force’s modernisation strategy and a technological counterbalance to both Pakistan and China.
Equipped with advanced AESA radar, Meteor and MICA air-to-air missiles, and state-of-the-art electronic warfare suites, the Rafale was marketed domestically as a “game-changer” capable of dominating South Asia’s contested skies.
However, Pakistan’s claims of Rafale losses in recent combat—if validated—would not only mark the fighter’s first-ever combat attrition but also deliver a reputational blow to India’s airpower ambitions and the credibility of its high-profile procurement.
Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs earlier confirmed that three Rafales, one Su-30MKI, and one MiG-29 were destroyed in the initial engagements, allegedly struck by PL-15E beyond-visual-range (BVR) air-to-air missiles launched from J-10C Vigorous Dragon fighters.
READ: Electronic Shockwave: Pakistan’s EW Arsenal Cripples Indian Rafales in High-Altitude Face-Off
The PAF claimed one Rafale was destroyed at an unprecedented range of 182 kilometres, underscoring the potency of the Chinese-made PL-15 missile, which combines active AESA radar homing with a speed exceeding Mach 4, placing it among the most advanced BVR systems currently fielded worldwide.
If true, the engagement would mark the first time in modern air combat that a frontline multirole fighter was destroyed at such extreme range, with implications that ripple far beyond South Asia and challenge Western doctrines on survivability in contested airspace.
On May 17, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif stunned regional observers by declaring that the PAF had downed six Indian fighters in the span of hours—an engagement some analysts have described as “the largest air battle in history.”
A sixth Indian aircraft, a Mirage 2000, was reportedly intercepted and destroyed in a night operation near Pampore, close to the volatile Line of Control, reinforcing Pakistan’s claim of dominance across multiple phases of the conflict.
“The much-hyped Rafale fighter jets have failed disastrously, and the Indian Air Force pilots have demonstrated a clear lack of proficiency,” Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar stated in a biting rebuke that directly targeted India’s prestige procurement programme.
His remarks not only questioned the operational credibility of the Rafale in its first real test under combat conditions, but also struck at the heart of New Delhi’s narrative that the French-built fighter would decisively tilt the balance of airpower in South Asia.
By framing the Rafale’s battlefield performance as a symbol of failure rather than prestige, Islamabad sought to undermine India’s strategic messaging, embarrass its leadership on the global stage, and highlight Pakistan’s own technological leap through platforms like the J-10C and the PL-15 missile system.
The controversy gained international traction when former U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking at a private Republican leadership dinner, remarked: “In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually.”
Though Trump did not specify the nationality of the downed jets, the off-hand comment highlighted that Washington had monitored the engagements closely and suggested that U.S. intelligence assessments may align more closely with Pakistan’s claims than India’s denials.
Pakistan’s J-10C fleet, built by Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group (CAIG), forms the backbone of its new-generation fighter inventory, with the PL-15E missile giving Islamabad a decisive long-range engagement capability against high-value Indian assets such as the Rafale and Su-30MKI.
Pakistan’s J-10C Vigorous Dragon fighters, supplied by China’s Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group, represent a major leap in the Pakistan Air Force’s capabilities with advanced AESA radar, network-centric warfare systems, and multirole versatility.
Armed with the PL-15 beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile—capable of striking targets up to 182 km away at speeds exceeding Mach 4—the J-10C gives Islamabad a potent long-range engagement advantage over India’s frontline fighters, including the Rafale and Su-30MKI.
Pakistan has ordered 36 J-10CE (export variant of the J-10C) fighters from China, of which 20 have been delivered and 16 remain on order.
The alleged Rafale kills, if validated, would represent the first combat losses of Dassault’s prized fighter, a platform hailed in Paris and New Delhi as the crown jewel of French aerospace engineering and India’s technological answer to both Chinese and Pakistani fleets.
India’s USD 8.7 billion (RM40.7 billion) Rafale procurement—consisting of 36 aircraft—was marketed domestically as a “game-changer,” giving the IAF an edge over regional rivals and projecting deterrence credibility in both South Asia and the wider Indo-Pacific.
Losing even three of those aircraft in a single campaign would not only slash force structure but also trigger a reputational crisis for the IAF and Indian political leadership, whose credibility has been staked on the Rafale deal.
French intelligence sources, cited by CNN national security correspondent Jim Sciutto, confirmed “at least one Rafale” had been shot down, while Reuters quoted U.S. defence officials attributing “at least two Indian fighter losses” to Pakistan’s J-10Cs, lending external validation to Islamabad’s claims.
Perhaps the most explosive acknowledgement came not from Pakistan, but from India itself—albeit indirectly.
© 2025, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
